You are accessing this forum with [trillian] as part of the url. This may be happening automatically following a move to a new server, or it may be something you are doing as part of a phpbb3 upgrade. If this is not part of an upgrade then be patient and do not bookmark the link, the old links will be working again shortly. If this is part of an upgrade then make sure the owner finalises it in the control panel and selects to redirect to this version of the forum, then once again the link will return to being the old one within 48 hours or so. NEVER BOOKMARK OR PUBLISH THIS LINK IT WILL NOT ALWAYS WORK.
That first one is hot!!!
The lighting is fabulous on the second one as well, but the shape of it isn't sexy (that is what we're going for with stilletos, yes?). The bottom/front portion is too fat. But- WOW! Awesome idea! I think you've inspired me to do some shoe shots. Would you mind giving a quick detail of how you set up the lighting/backround for this? I'm really impressed. _________________ Discovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought. - Albert Gyorgyi
Thanks Blue, I wondered about putting the second picture up, but I'm glad I did because it gave a comparison. I started with the camera too high and the shoe didn't come alive until I dropped the hight and then you start to see it's a shoe that means business. I've wanted to do a stiletto for some time because I would be hard pushed to think of a more iconic object, it's loaded with sexual or sensual meanings as well as socio-political meanings.
The lighting for this one was as in the picture below. I did try it without any diffusers as I didn't think a spot light would be too much of a problem, but didn't like it. If you don't have studio lights or diffusers, I'd suggest either a tented sheet or greaseproof/oven paper. My settings were - ISO 100, f14, 1/100 sec.
My next effort is going to be trying a black background, with the shoe on glass, as Adam did with the jewellery.
Thanks for your comment Adam. There's something about product shots that fascinates me, just a tin of soup is a challenge. Yep, this shot is post production, I converted to black and white and got rid of some stray glue around the seams.
second image - think the angle is all wrong (for me), would have liked to see it at more of an acute angle so that the front of the show is coming into play and more open area between the hell and shoe _________________ -----------------------------------------------------
second image - think the angle is all wrong (for me), would have liked to see it at more of an acute angle so that the front of the show is coming into play and more open area between the hell and shoe
I agree with the Dave the front of the shoe seems to just fizzle out, it needs to be more prominent / more in the shot.
The first is just great, maybe the lighting on the sides a little strong if you want me to be picky as the edges seem to be lost (but this might be just my taste / my monitor).
Not that I have alot of experience with high heels you understand but just showed the wife your 2 shots and she says ignore what I've said about the first one as she thinks thats great, but the second she'd like to see more of the front of the shoe also. Don't know if thats any help getting another womans view on things. _________________
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Join! (free) 
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
but just showed the wife your 2 shots and she says ignore what I've said about the first one as she thinks thats great, but the second she'd like to see more of the front of the shoe also. Don't know if thats any help getting another womans view on things.