You are accessing this forum with [trillian] as part of the url. This may be happening automatically following a move to a new server, or it may be something you are doing as part of a phpbb3 upgrade. If this is not part of an upgrade then be patient and do not bookmark the link, the old links will be working again shortly. If this is part of an upgrade then make sure the owner finalises it in the control panel and selects to redirect to this version of the forum, then once again the link will return to being the old one within 48 hours or so. NEVER BOOKMARK OR PUBLISH THIS LINK IT WILL NOT ALWAYS WORK.
personally, i'd want longer than 60mm - tamron do a nice 90mm one
from what i understand, the loss of autofocus isn't a big deal when taking macro stuff tho _________________ There is nothing in life that cannot be improved with either monkeys, pirates or ninjas NPU Member
60 means in effect that you will have to be a lot closer to the subject than if you had a 90.
I have a 105 Sigma which gives me about 150mm from lens to subject at 1:1. Better if you want to do some insects withjout frightening them away too soon. _________________ -----------------------------------------------------
carl is a big macro shooter, hopefully he'll notice this thread too _________________ There is nothing in life that cannot be improved with either monkeys, pirates or ninjas NPU Member
Forgot to add that the Tamron 90 and Sigma 105 got very good reviews and not a lot to choose between them _________________ -----------------------------------------------------
Have a look at both - and try them - if shop won't let you try then go somewhere else. Its about you beimg comfortable when using it.
The Sigma lens moves out a good way (like a zoom).
Don't know about the Nikkor.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum