You are accessing this forum with [trillian] as part of the url. This may be happening automatically following a move to a new server, or it may be something you are doing as part of a phpbb3 upgrade. If this is not part of an upgrade then be patient and do not bookmark the link, the old links will be working again shortly. If this is part of an upgrade then make sure the owner finalises it in the control panel and selects to redirect to this version of the forum, then once again the link will return to being the old one within 48 hours or so. NEVER BOOKMARK OR PUBLISH THIS LINK IT WILL NOT ALWAYS WORK.
Thanks Mike. Was it just the blown highlights that were bothering you, or were you looking for creative ideas with the picture? Personally, I think it's a great picture as is. _________________
Yeh sorry Keith, didn't make it very clear in my first post
Have to say though do you think it would be worth removing the people from the background? _________________
Yeh sorry Keith, didn't make it very clear in my first post
Nor you should mate, it's good to just see what comes up, so spare your tender noggin.
Venom wrote:
Have to say though do you think it would be worth removing the people from the background?
I ummed and arred about that. It's a very natural shot and I am even prepared to forgive the bloke on the right for not paying attention. I can't feel any creative juices flowing around changing the background, no ideas at all, which in my world usually means leave it alone. Well, not strictly true, I am tempted to remove said bloke, but that'd be a HUGE challenge. _________________
Thanks evo for the smile I have on my face this morning, love the sweeper
LMAO, Evo.
Nice one, cheers Keith showed the chop tho the bride and she thinks its great. I believe she said better than her actual wedding pictures lol. _________________
Nice one, cheers Keith showed the chop tho the bride and she thinks its great. I believe she said better than her actual wedding pictures lol.
No worries, it was quite a challenge to create a backdrop that worked with the couple, that backdrop is a pastiche of a couple of pictures cobbled together to get something I liked. Any way, if you want the full sized picture, it's here. Cheers.
it was quite a challenge to create a backdrop that worked with the couple, that backdrop is a pastiche of a couple of pictures cobbled together to get something I liked.
I was going to comment on the very nice job on the background. If I hadn't seen the original, I would never have suspected it was added in later.
Well deserved praise. I can be exceptionally critical of photoshop manipulations, especially those that are heavy handed (and I can be as guilty as any of producing those ).
I've looked very closely at your handiwork and it's top shelf!
I can almost always spot the halo of sharpening or the artifacts from selections.
Dodging, smudging, burning, cloning, etc. usually leave tell-tale signs too.
I have to admit, I don't really see any significant indications of those in your image. You have truly earned your moniker, Photochop Guru! _________________ see my photography at john.seelbinder.org
Thanks again John. It's a funny old thing, the innate (?) insecurity around ones work. I was recently approached by someone who wanted a whole series of chops done for an exhibition. I wrote to him and sent a sample of work, and never heard from him again. The committee in my head ran with, 'I am crap and he hated my work and who do I think I am anyway'. Later, having thought about it a bit, no reply just isn't my problem. I have no idea why he hasn't got in touch, and any or all the scenarios I run in my head are not reality. But When the elastic goes in my security and I suddenly find it around my ankles once again, it is, as now, nice to be appreciated. Thanks and all the best. Keith.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum