Archive for Mikes Photography A Photography Forum for Beginners and Professionals alike. Why not become a Member and Join us.
You are accessing this forum with [trillian] as part of the url. This may be happening automatically following a move to a new server, or it may be something you are doing as part of a phpbb3 upgrade. If this is not part of an upgrade then be patient and do not bookmark the link, the old links will be working again shortly. If this is part of an upgrade then make sure the owner finalises it in the control panel and selects to redirect to this version of the forum, then once again the link will return to being the old one within 48 hours or so. NEVER BOOKMARK OR PUBLISH THIS LINK IT WILL NOT ALWAYS WORK.
"None of the above", but that's not to say that the image is not good, as it is - would it be forced perspective?
GREENWIZARD
it's shot using a 50mm lens & tube
creators
hil26 wrote:
could say
"None of the above", but that's not to say that the image is not good, as it is - would it be forced perspective?
Probably not because without an explanation there would be no inherent story between the two images, or I don't think there is an intuitive link between the magazine and the bible. Nice image mind.
GREENWIZARD
guys i think some togger anoraks would try & live their lives doing everything the photomags tell them to do lol just as some peeps live their lives according to the scriptures ;)
creators
Quite agree, eg. a portrait isn't a portrait without eye glints. It was just the side issue of forced perspective that we're on about.
GREENWIZARD
ooops i'm fick
creators
Na, I'll speak for myself, went a bit geeky there for a mo.
