Archive for Mikes Photography A Photography Forum for Beginners and Professionals alike. Why not become a Member and Join us.
 


       Mikes Photography Forum Index -> Macro
creators

Playing

hil26

Nice watch - was it at an angle to the camera? DOF seeems to go out looking at the 120 and 240 marks

Second hand lovely and sharp
creators

I had it angled to get the second hand and the foreground numbers, I had to have the camera at a weird angle to get the shot I wanted.
Evolution104

I like this thumbright

Excellent dof to isolate the seconds hand, and yet you kept some of the numbers in focus as well.
Deeper focus would have diluted the interest I think.

If anything, I might like to see an even shallower dof to really make the seconds hand really pop.

Nice colours too! And no abberations - no dust, no scratches, no fingerprints, no reflections ...

Perfect!
creators

Thanks very much for your comment John. This was the setup, just in case you'd like to see it.

Evolution104

That's something I need to spend some effort on.

I've always pretty much been a landscape/nature photographer, and I always improvise on kit for still-life/studio shots. That usually means using a single desk lamp with a quartz halogen lamp (as close to white as I can manage). My recent closeups for the alphabet challenge used an overhead incandescent and a flashlight (torch?) to minimize shadows, and a black t-shirt as a background. I can see the advantage of multiple light sources to reduce shadows.

Thanks for sharing your setup - I have actually considered doing the same on occasion. I think that can be very interesting and educational. Pro setups are the holy grail, but I love seeing the "McGuyver" versions!
creators

I'm slowly getting some kit together, but until I do a course in studio work it's mostly wasted on me at the moment. The desk lamps are invaluable though. This is what I currently have, all clumped together.

Evolution104

Compared to me - you have a pro kit Very Happy

Maybe the next time I do a closeup, I'll capture my setup and share the mess I usually end up with Laughing
creators

That'd be great, I love being nosy, seeing what people are doing behind the scenes. A bit like photoshop really, I enjoy the process as much as I enjoy the results.
Evolution104

Yeah, it'll be good for a laugh.

I use paper towels for reflectors, shirts for backdrops and flashlights for fill-lighting Confused
creators

What'll be good for me is to see the effect of the setup in the shot because I haven't developed an eye for indoor work yet. It's still incredibly hit or miss, that awful floundering feeling. Which is why I need to do a course. I had two requests from models this month to do some portfolio work and I refused out of the sheer embarrassment of my ignorance. It would have been an opportunity to learn but I couldn't face it. Sad but true.
jonH

you're only going to _really_ learn by doing!

why not try and find some recommendations of books to read - fair enough you don't get the benefit of face-to-face tuition but the outlay is considerably less than a course.
creators

jonH wrote:
you're only going to _really_ learn by doing!

why not try and find some recommendations of books to read - fair enough you don't get the benefit of face-to-face tuition but the outlay is considerably less than a course.


Oddly enough, I dug out the manual that came with the lights I've got, last night. The first time I looked at it it all made as much sense as a fish with a bike, but having done some messing about, it might be easier to absorb now, and, as you say, if I set situations up per the book, I'll see by doing. So thanks for the suggestion. The other benefit of doing a course, though, is confidence, which is something that develops around others easier than from trial and error alone.
sean

I'm loving this email thread. It's really great to see conversations where people share their knowledge like this.

When I get the spare bedroom finished I'd like to turn it into a studio. I've been looking at the Elinchron & Bowens kits, but with the results the mighty Creators has got, it just goes to show that a bit of imagination and know-how you don't need to spend a fortune on top-end kit.

I quite like the comment about making the second hand the primary focal point, but would this be close to impossible without Photoshopping the rest if the face with a blur?

Creators - can you do this without cheating?!
creators

I'll have a go Sean, I think you're probably right but I'll try.

If anyone got here quick enough to notice that this post has changed, it's because I completely misread and misunderstood Seans post. Duh.
creators

Cor, that was challenging and I still haven't got it how I envisioned it. Never mind. I increased the angle of the camera to the watch face to force the DoF issue. It gets pretty dramatic.

creators

sean wrote:

When I get the spare bedroom finished I'd like to turn it into a studio. I've been looking at the Elinchron & Bowens kits, but with the results the mighty Creators has got, it just goes to show that a bit of imagination and know-how you don't need to spend a fortune on top-end kit.


Had I had the dosh, I'd have gone for a more sophisticated lighting rig, but the real problem for me has been not understanding the first thing about how to use any lighting. Having never done a course or any study about studio lighting, it has been painful, and I mean that, trial and error. Mostly error. I actually feel now that something is starting to sink in. My trouble is I get discouraged too easily, so everything is a lot slower because of that.
Evolution104

I like this! Superb colours and dof. A fav!
creators wrote:
Cor, that was challenging and I still haven't got it how I envisioned it. Never mind. I increased the angle of the camera to the watch face to force the DoF issue. It gets pretty dramatic.

creators

Thanks John, trying to focus on the second hand sweep was a nightmare, my eyesight just ain't that good any more. A magnifying eye cup is a must and next on the list.
jonH

really like the latest attempt; nice one!
sean

That's a pretty good shot at it - very impressed with your attempts at this subject. Even with a good macro lens and decent lighting it would still be quite tough to represent such a shallow depth.

For what it's worth, don't get discouraged - it's the one thing that can set you back for no real reason and is something I kick myself about from time to time! I can be my own worst enemy at times... Crying or Very sad
creators

Thanks Sean. "I can be my own worst enemy at times..." In so far as this is concerned, I think I can safely say 'always'. I think every manual and book should start with encouraging an attitude of playfulness.
hil26

creators wrote:
Thanks Sean. "I can be my own worst enemy at times..." In so far as this is concerned, I think I can safely say 'always'. I think every manual and book should start with encouraging an attitude of playfulness.


Keith - that shot is much better, in fact it's very good. Have you tried softening the lighting from the desk lamps to see what that would give? I have no idea but would love to see the effect it might give, as not too sure that they may be a shade too bright. I have not done any work with lighting so please excuse if I am wide of the mark
creators

hil26 wrote:


Keith - that shot is much better, in fact it's very good. Have you tried softening the lighting from the desk lamps to see what that would give? I have no idea but would love to see the effect it might give, as not too sure that they may be a shade too bright. I have not done any work with lighting so please excuse if I am wide of the mark


Dave, I have no idea if you are wide of the mark or not, until I try it. So your suggestion is very welcome. I am looking at a decent soft box for the flash unit, but the desk lamps need some Heath Robinson contraptions. Everything I am doing is Heath Robinson! Watch this space and thanks. Just for the record, I'll be trying grease proof paper.
creators

I have no idea....

hil26

Ditto - earlier one appears better, maybe its the grease proof paper? LOL
creators

hil26 wrote:
Ditto - earlier one appears better, maybe its the grease proof paper? LOL


I think you're right, it isn't a subject that is suitable for soft lighting. Hindsight, marvelous stuff. Good to experiment though.

       Mikes Photography Forum Index -> Macro
Page 1 of 1
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum