hil26
|
NoiseTook this yesterday at Ladybower.
Lighting was not great so upped to Iso 400. Seems to be a lot of noise - and seems to be same level as when I had the D70.
Looks like Noise Ninja here I come
|
derek
|
no photo
|
hil26
|
| derek wrote: | no photo  |
OOPS!!! That what comes from being rushed, had to go out in a hurry
|
jonH
|
difficult to see at that size - any chance of a section of it at 100%??
could just be haze
|
derek
|
Love that reflection! Can you go back there for a closer shot? Looks a great location.
|
creators
|
Yeh, looks ok to me at that size.
|
hil26
|
| hil26 wrote: | | derek wrote: | Love that reflection! Can you go back there for a closer shot? Looks a great location.  |
Location is lovely, but getting there at the right time for calm conditions is "hit and miss" for me, as I am either going past too early, or coming back too late - one of these days though ....... Would love to be there on a calm bright morning
Getting closer would mean putting longer lens on, which I did not have with me.
JON - it was hazy, which could be seen on the hills beyond
 |
|
jonH
|
according to the info on flickr you shot at -4/3 ev - i know compensation isn't always reliably reported so could you confirm if or not you had any compensation dialled in?
i ask because if you have purposely under-exposed, then brightened the pic up in pp, this will increase noise dramatically.
you've shot f/20 again - i really can't emphasise enough about not shooting any narrower than f/16 - you'll not get any better dof due to diffraction
i only ever go above f/11 if i purposely need a longer shutter time (i still don't have any nd filters) and you've obviously not needed that this time if you've been @ iso400
|
hil26
|
| jonH wrote: | according to the info on flickr you shot at -4/3 ev - i know compensation isn't always reliably reported so could you confirm if or not you had any compensation dialled in?
i ask because if you have purposely under-exposed, then brightened the pic up in pp, this will increase noise dramatically.
you've shot f/20 again - i really can't emphasise enough about not shooting any narrower than f/16 - you'll not get any better dof due to diffraction
i only ever go above f/11 if i purposely need a longer shutter time (i still don't have any nd filters) and you've obviously not needed that this time if you've been @ iso400 |
Jon
exposure comp diallled in to reduce the blown sky - and foreground brightened - think you have hit the nail on the head
Thanks for reminding me about dof, cannot think why I went to f20 on this one, have to admit that I was a little short of time and "rushing".
Many thanks
|
carlj
|
Dave, do you use nd grads? Far safer than underexposure as Jon says.
|
hil26
|
| carlj wrote: | | Dave, do you use nd grads? Far safer than underexposure as Jon says. |
Have got one, but guess what, this particular day - not in the bag -
thanks
|
jonH
|
AEB can still be used - don't have to produce an HDR image from the results - layer blending is always an option
|
hil26
|
| jonH wrote: | | AEB can still be used - don't have to produce an HDR image from the results - layer blending is always an option |
Jon - believe it or not, layer blending is what I ended up doing on the Glyderau images, but using smart objects in CS3 - no need for two seperate exposures on the day.
And......what an idiot I am, fo I forgot about it, as I did a liitle tutorial on here
see
http://mikesphotography.myfreeforum.org/about1743.html
|
jonH
|
lol oops
|
|
|