hil26
|
Incense smoke - advise appreciatedTrying something different - seen something in a recent magazine - so thought I'd give it a go.
basically, incense stick, black background (couldn't see what I was doing - smoke very faint against the background), one flash to the left - probably need some barn doors to help focus the flash.
Manually focused on the top of the stick, and then tried various shutter speeds at f16 (have no idea why I chose f16 - its supposed to be sharpest f stop on lens - so I am told)
This one, best of bunch at 15 secs exposure.
Into photoshop, inversed, small tweaks on levels and colour and this is the result - any input to improve will be gratefully receieved.
|
Venom
|
Nice shot, the only thing for me is the smoke going off the top of the picture, but this might be my personal taste.
|
hil26
|
thanks MIke, lots of patienec required for these
this one is a 10 sec exposure, and some playing around with colours in photoshop
|
Venom
|
Now for me this one is much better, not sure about the colour but the position of the smoke in the frame is great.
|
creators
|
I love to see some experimenting going on. There is always something wonderful about smoke shots, no matter how unpopular and even though these are incense, good stuff Dave, I like them both.
|
hil26
|
ahh, think I have just discovered where I am going wrong.
The images I have taken so far are just not sharp enough, and I think its to do woth not enough light (although using studio light) and a fast enough shutter speed - so off to the drawing board again tonight.
|
hil26
|
Think I am beginning to crack this now
ISO 100, 1/125s, f13
ISO 100, 1/125s, f20
I was playing with the f numbers to see the cause and effect, only reason they are different
|
flapjack
|
experimentingI love the photo with the black background. Could see this as a very large blown-up photo in a very modern room
|
Jan
|
Awesome work David... I love the smoke on the black background the best!
|
creators
|
f numbers seem to be much more critical under studio conditions I am beginning to discover. I agree about the black background, very nice shot.
|
jonH
|
just don't get too crazy with narrow apertures - don't forget about diffraction at high values
|
Gilly
|
I love the black bachground one too - it gives a real sense of what I think you are trying to achieve.
The one immediately above it would (in my opinion) work really good with a black background too....... any chance of some colour swapping Dave (hint hint!!)
|
hil26
|
Jon - thanks, experimenting and what I can glean form others who try this, seems to suggest that f12 - f16 is probably the optimum - will still experiment though - difficulty is that you can repeat what you just did, as the smoke goes all over the place.
Gilly - believe me the black background did not work on this shot, will post if you would like to see.
Whilst doing these have found a good way to inverse the image - it involves using curves and gives better results
|
Gilly
|
| hil26 wrote: |
Gilly - believe me the black background did not work on this shot, will post if you would like to see.
|
I'll take your word for it Dave - your work, and your eye, so i'll not despute your opinion!
The ones you have posted work for me!
|
Simonzphotoz
|
| hil26 wrote: | ISO 100, 1/125s, f20
 |
Now that is frikin awesome......
|
hil26
|
thanks Simon
|
Simonzphotoz
|
Dave, personally I prefer the darker backgrounds, it brings out the colour and shape of the smoke, with the coloured smoke is that editing or the actual colour? Just a thought, but would it be possible to find a card background that contrasts with the smoke colour, like the white on black. I find with the other pictures that the smoke tends to blend a bit with the background and then looses definition. I didn't read the whole post so sorry if someone else said it first.
HTH
|
hil26
|
Thanks Simon
The colour in the smoke is actually brought out using the hue and saturation tools according to your particular taste.
What I found was that no two pictures were giving me the same colour replication - might be due to distance of smoke from lens and different dof's - smoke was moving back and forward all the time, even with very little movement in the room.
The images need to be taken against a black background as the smoke is almost invisible against a white. All info I can find say use a black background, but keep the flash light off it, use snoot or barn doors to direct the light onto the smoke - I actually used rolled up black card over the light, as I have neither of those pieces of kit.
The image is inverted in the image editing program - but you need to make sure that you have a totally black background - found using a "V" shape in curves did wonders for getting that bit right.
The reason I put the pinkish image up on white was that I did like the shape it produced, but on black its was awful. I have actually printed it off and mounted a small version of it (6x4), mount colour being similar shade of pink - and it works.
This site was most helpful
http://www.photocritic.org/2007/artsmoke-photographing-smoke/
|
Simonzphotoz
|
sounds like you did your research, I was just wondering that was all. great shots though...
|
|
|