Archive for Mikes Photography A Photography Forum for Beginners and Professionals alike. Why not become a Member and Join us.
You are accessing this forum with [trillian] as part of the url. This may be happening automatically following a move to a new server, or it may be something you are doing as part of a phpbb3 upgrade. If this is not part of an upgrade then be patient and do not bookmark the link, the old links will be working again shortly. If this is part of an upgrade then make sure the owner finalises it in the control panel and selects to redirect to this version of the forum, then once again the link will return to being the old one within 48 hours or so. NEVER BOOKMARK OR PUBLISH THIS LINK IT WILL NOT ALWAYS WORK.
I was just thinking today that I can't wait for spring! Very nice pictures!
Simonzphotoz
beaut kif, like the top one especially.
Evolution104
Ah - nice
I like the background in the second one. Lots of interest without distracting the eye from the subject.
Sigh, we're still a good three and a half months away from sights like this
creators
Thanks for your comments. I must say that No.2 pleases me more for the same reasons John gave. It made me remember something that they taught us in art school, negative spaces. When drawing, say, a chair, if you get the spaces right the object will be right, and so often when taking pictures the shot is let down not by the object but by the background or the setting. I am aware that framing the shot is important, but as an exersize I am going to try to change how I take pictures. In seeing something I want to take a shot of, I wonder, if I ignore that and scan the rest of the frame can I work towards more dynamic pictures?
hil26
second shot works for me, petals seem to be more in focus and framing for me is better - background is wonderful on it, discreet/not distracting but there
jonH
i like the second one, but the noise is a little distracting to me.
creators
jonH wrote:
i like the second one, but the noise is a little distracting to me.
Thanks Jon, interesting comment. I took it with my new Macro lens and am still working it out. That shot was on f6.3 1/1000, at that distance I could probably have taken it at a lower f stop and reduced the amount of noise. I can still do that digitally, but I probably need to do some series shooting to work out what DoF works at different distances.
creators
My ego not withstanding, It's beginning to register what a point and snap merchant I am. This is the same shot with some noise reduction.
And here's one taken on f2.8 with pretty much the same problem, and then some reduction added, which all says to me, I don't know what I am doing yet. Old dog, new tricks, comes to mind.
