You are accessing this forum with [trillian] as part of the url. This may be happening automatically following a move to a new server, or it may be something you are doing as part of a phpbb3 upgrade. If this is not part of an upgrade then be patient and do not bookmark the link, the old links will be working again shortly. If this is part of an upgrade then make sure the owner finalises it in the control panel and selects to redirect to this version of the forum, then once again the link will return to being the old one within 48 hours or so. NEVER BOOKMARK OR PUBLISH THIS LINK IT WILL NOT ALWAYS WORK.
wonderful colours, but I find the cables (I presume) accross the top a little distracting _________________ --
There are 10 types of people that understand binary.
Those that do and those that don't.
I love the top one - what would be the easiest way to remove the cables? I've tried doing that with a couple of my shots but using ACDSee software and it's not that great. _________________ My Flickr Pics
When cables cut across so much detail I know of no way other than painstakingly zoom in tight and clone, there's no substitute for time and attention to detail. _________________
When cables cut across so much detail I know of no way other than painstakingly zoom in tight and clone, there's no substitute for time and attention to detail.
This article is how we do it for the movies. But, we have several frames to play with. _________________ --
There are 10 types of people that understand binary.
Those that do and those that don't.
When cables cut across so much detail I know of no way other than painstakingly zoom in tight and clone, there's no substitute for time and attention to detail.
This article is how we do it for the movies. But, we have several frames to play with.
I shall go through that later, thanks for posting it. Some of the jargon defeats me as I've never come across it before. I often use patching when I can get a clean shot and know I am going to need it. Of course the problems you face in film, like boiling, doesn't apply to stills, so I guess we have more leeway as long as the finished result is believable.
For still work the big issue is congruence, which what believability is about. Making sure any work done doesn't poke you in the eye. Nothing there that shouldn't be there and everything there hanging together. _________________
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Join! (free) 
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
