You are accessing this forum with [trillian] as part of the url. This may be happening automatically following a move to a new server, or it may be something you are doing as part of a phpbb3 upgrade. If this is not part of an upgrade then be patient and do not bookmark the link, the old links will be working again shortly. If this is part of an upgrade then make sure the owner finalises it in the control panel and selects to redirect to this version of the forum, then once again the link will return to being the old one within 48 hours or so. NEVER BOOKMARK OR PUBLISH THIS LINK IT WILL NOT ALWAYS WORK.
BEWARE OF SCAMMERS ASKING FOR ADMIN ACCESS. WE NEVER ASK FOR ACCESS.
Love that reflection! Can you go back there for a closer shot? Looks a great location.
Location is lovely, but getting there at the right time for calm conditions is "hit and miss" for me, as I am either going past too early, or coming back too late - one of these days though ....... Would love to be there on a calm bright morning
Getting closer would mean putting longer lens on, which I did not have with me.
JON - it was hazy, which could be seen on the hills beyond
according to the info on flickr you shot at -4/3 ev - i know compensation isn't always reliably reported so could you confirm if or not you had any compensation dialled in?
i ask because if you have purposely under-exposed, then brightened the pic up in pp, this will increase noise dramatically.
you've shot f/20 again - i really can't emphasise enough about not shooting any narrower than f/16 - you'll not get any better dof due to diffraction
i only ever go above f/11 if i purposely need a longer shutter time (i still don't have any nd filters) and you've obviously not needed that this time if you've been @ iso400 _________________ There is nothing in life that cannot be improved with either monkeys, pirates or ninjas NPU Member
according to the info on flickr you shot at -4/3 ev - i know compensation isn't always reliably reported so could you confirm if or not you had any compensation dialled in?
i ask because if you have purposely under-exposed, then brightened the pic up in pp, this will increase noise dramatically.
you've shot f/20 again - i really can't emphasise enough about not shooting any narrower than f/16 - you'll not get any better dof due to diffraction
i only ever go above f/11 if i purposely need a longer shutter time (i still don't have any nd filters) and you've obviously not needed that this time if you've been @ iso400
Jon
exposure comp diallled in to reduce the blown sky - and foreground brightened - think you have hit the nail on the head
Thanks for reminding me about dof, cannot think why I went to f20 on this one, have to admit that I was a little short of time and "rushing".
Many thanks _________________ -----------------------------------------------------
AEB can still be used - don't have to produce an HDR image from the results - layer blending is always an option _________________ There is nothing in life that cannot be improved with either monkeys, pirates or ninjas NPU Member
AEB can still be used - don't have to produce an HDR image from the results - layer blending is always an option
Jon - believe it or not, layer blending is what I ended up doing on the Glyderau images, but using smart objects in CS3 - no need for two seperate exposures on the day.
And......what an idiot I am, fo I forgot about it, as I did a liitle tutorial on here
see
http://mikesphotography.myfreeforum.org/about1743.html _________________ -----------------------------------------------------
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Join! (free) 
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
